A lot of very odd events happen in the world. Out of nowhere a politician, possibly even a present or a presidential candidate, gets shot, skyscrapers collapse, helicopters crash, and key witnesses who are described as happy-go-lucky personalities suddenly commit suicide by shooting themselves in the back of their skull. I am not even exaggerating much. More importantly, the official narrative of such unfortunate events does not line up with reality because it is just too nonsensical.

There are, of course, standard refutations when you question the mainstream narrative. For instance, the triple-vaxxed moron wants to tell you that you should take off your tinfoil hat, roll up your sleeve, and stop endangering others with your reckless behavior. Besides, you did not study medicine, so what do you even know about health in general and vaccinations in particular? Well, obviously you can deduce a lot from the supposed facts that are presented to you, even if you do not have full knowledge of events, which other people also do not have. To give you a very simple example: Supposedly, the passports of the supposed terrorists who flew planes into the twin towers on 9/11 were salvaged. The planes went up in a ball of fire. We are told that temperatures were so high that steel was melting (lol). Yet, passports are apparently made of heat-resistant material, and they just conveniently were found shortly after the crash, in the rubble of the twin towers.

Probably the simplest question you can ask yourself is, “What are the odds of X happening?” Of course, the philosophically inclined may now waffle about singular events not having any probability associated with them but surely there are chains of events that are a lot less plausible than others. Clearly, there are freak accidents but sometimes the published narrative is so utterly absurd, or so incomplete, that you should immediately be able to conclude that something is off, even if you do not have “proof”. Interestingly, that kind of objection is not acknowledged at all by government-supported “fact checkers”. In addition, there the simple question, “Cui bono?” (Whom is this good for?) Yes, this is a phrase in Latin, but this only goes to show that this kind of skepticism was also warranted in antiquity. Of course, you should not jump to any conclusion. In fact, it is almost trivial to frame someone for a crime they have not committed by highlighting how much that person would personally benefit from it.

There were a number of prominent terrorist events that have been suspected to be false flags or inside jobs, such as 9/11, the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, Sandy Hook, the Boston Marathon bombing, the recent assassination attempt on Trump, etc. Obviously, I completely follow the party line and denounce any such conspiracy theories. However, I want to use a more recent example, and one that is perhaps not very well known globally. A few days ago, there was a mass stabbing in a German town called Solingen, and the chain of events is laughably absurd. Let me give you a quick summary:

– There was the 650-year celebration in Solingen, a town well-known, perhaps even globally, for the high quality of the knives (!) manufactured there
– Aforementioned celebration was officially held under the banner of promoting multiculturalism
– A Muslim kills three and seriously injures eight
– The attacker is an illegal immigrant who should have been deported but was not, for whatever reason
– The stabbing took place in the late evening, arguably during peak hours of the festival
– There are no video recordings of the stabbings
– We have heard virtually nothing of the people who were killed or injured. Do they not have families, friends, lovers? What are their first names?
– According to independent analyses, the supposedly authentic mug shot of the perpetrator was created with AI
– The attacker dropped his jacket, together with his passport
– Later, the alleged perpetrator shows up at the police station, allegedly with blood smeared all over his face, and confesses

I am getting Sandy Hook vibes here. While I obviously do not doubt the official narrative around Sandy Hook at all, I can understand why some people wonder if “crisis actors” had been involved. Of course, Sandy Hook was an attempt to curtail the second amendment, i.e. the right to bear arms. It also gave us that astroturfed clown David Hogg. In contrast, what could the possible reason for a false flag on German soil be? The answer is quite interesting: There are three important elections coming up, all in the East, and in all of them the AfD is poised to win. Even an entirely new left party, the BSW, has been astroturfed, in an attempt to regain voters who have turned their back to the radical-left mainstream. Yet, the political mainstream has not found a good response to the popularity of the AfD, apart from frivolous lawsuits, Antifa thugs, and raiding the homes of key party members.

After having supported unfettered mass immigration for decades, the mainstream parties cannot just turn around and claim that they really did not mean it. They have zero credibility left. However, what if here was a false flag, and one so shocking and symbolic, that the leaders of the mainstream parties would have a reason to speak critically of mass immigration? Alas, this is exactly what happened: after the Solingen stabbings, the two mainstream parties SPD and CDU suddenly want to limit immigration, and also ban knives (lol). They now have a very welcome pretense. Thus, the hope is that with this sudden tough stance on illegal immigration, which will obviously only last until the elections are over, the mainstream hopes to undermine the AfD at the polls.

I am not saying that I am right, but if I had my schizo hat on, this is roughly what I would be thinking. The logic is quite compelling. It seems to match reality, and it is also coherent. Of course, this is only a mental exercise. That being said, even some of the most outlandish hypotheses I have formed about the modern world in the past have turned out to be true. Try on the schizo hat sometimes! You may be surprised by how well it fits.