We are currently in a time of deep social unrest. While the current riots have been manufactured, their social and economic consequences are real. The same is true of the effects of the Covid-19 psyops operation. Covid-19 is about as dangerous as the common flu, yet we crashed our economies for it. If you follow the news, you also know that the Fed as well as the ECB have been engaging in yet another round of “deficit spending”, colloquially referred to as “printing money”. The effects of all of this are easy to predict: The stock market will keep getting artificially propped up and countless businesses will close, in particular small to medium-sized ones.
In the post-apocalyptic present we’re living in, secure jobs will be difficult to come by. Overall, this will leave one kind of employee the best off: the government bureaucrat. They can’t get fired, they can’t get coaxed into working harder, and their employer has the power to always print more money. This means that they will be safe as long as there isn’t an actual collapse of government. Even inflation doesn’t need to bother those people much because they will get paid with a nominally higher salary to make up for inflation. In contrast, the unemployed and underemployed masses won’t be quite so lucky.
As we know from other collapsing countries, women quickly forget about the whole feminist thing once there is no longer any food on the table. A good recent example is Venezuela. Once the country’s economy was in ruins, women flocked to neighboring Colombia to prostitute themselves (note the “gender-neutral” headline of that mainstream rag!). This includes strong, empowered female doctors and business executives. The tables can turn fast very quickly. I can’t quite see American women whoring themselves out over in Canada, with all their tattoos, blue hair, and excess body fat. It’s currently illegal anyway, but I would not be surprised if the Canadian government would turn a blind eye to American entrepreneurial women, Sweden-style, where only the purchaser, if he happens to be male, commits a crime.
Of course, not all Venezuelan women whore themselves out over in Colombia. This was a fate for those who were unable or unwilling to secure a provider. You can probably guess how in-demand the few men with stable incomes in Venezuela were when the proverbial fecal matter hit the fan. We’ll see the same unfold in the United States and Europe, albeit probably not at that scale. Once we enter a sustained recession, women will rediscover their traditional side and quickly forget about the fact that they were oppressed by the patriarchy before. Instead, they’ll happily enter an oppressive relationship with a man for unilateral financial benefit.
The men best positioned for this are employees of large corporations and government employees. The former are in a somewhat less secure position because businesses, even large ones, fail all the time. On top, the modern economy consists of a lot of so-called “zombie companies” that are only propped-up by extremely cheap debt. They don’t have a lot of leeway and could end up collapsing very quickly. All it takes is the Fed or ECB deciding not to pile on even more corporate debt. In turn, corporations will have a hard time finding buyers for their long-term debt obligations, and there are limits with regards to the amount of money they could raise on the commercial paper market, i.e. in short-term securities. A very good argument can be made that the vast majority of today’s publicly traded corporations are not in good health. Even if they have solid finances, a sudden drop in stop prices may lead to CEOs panicking and initiating mass layoffs. That’s been standard procedure for decades now. Given how high price/earning rations nowadays are, I’d say that stocks, and thus the companies that issues them, have somewhat limited upside, but quite some downside.
In contrast, a government employee does not have to worry about anything at all. Even if nothing works anymore in the country, he’ll get paid. They are essentially like the feudal elite of yesteryear. In concrete terms, this will mean that even less-than-Chad-like men will find themselves in demand once a recession hits. This does not mean that we will see doughy government stooges have porn-level sex with a plethora of women. The fundamental factors of attraction won’t change. However, if women get put in a position in which they need a man to survive, plenty will prefer having sex with a man they don’t find particularly attractive over going hungry. Besides, they can still fuck Chad during the day, so it’s just a minor inconvenience to put up with a beta-buxx provider at home for a few waking hours.
This blog depends on your contributions. So, share your view and comment on this article (comment policy). Then, to ensure the survival of this blog, donate. If you haven’t bought Aaron’s books yet, buy them, all of them. Lastly, if you want tailored and honest advice, book some one-on-one consultation sessions.