Men · Misc.

My experience with Jordan Peterson’s Future Authoring Program

I didn’t think I’d ever shill for an online product, but my opinion of Jordan Peterson’s Future Authoring Program is indeed a positive one. In summary, it is a guided writing exercise, to the tune of $14.95, which will lead you to clarify your goals and help you reach them.

In essence, the process is as follows: you look at who you are and who you want to become. You are also asked to visualize what would happen to you if you slacked and didn’t stick to your plans. The goal is then to create the ideal future self out of your pathetic present self. The total effort required is about 2 x 2 hours, and you are recommended to repeat the exercise in regular intervals, for instance once every six months.

Peterson’s marketing for the Future Authoring Program proclaims certain quantitative improvements, for instance, members of a particular group improved their GPA by x percent. All of this may sound impressive, if you bother to look it up. However, the problem with that kind of claim is that it focuses on groups that perform extremely poorly. To make this more easily understandable, let’s assume you have A and B lifting weights. A squats 50 lbs, which is pretty pathetic, but B squats 250 lbs, which is quite good. Now, if a personal trainer intervened and got A to squat 150 lbs, he could claim that he improved his client’s performance by 200%. In comparison, B is already doing fairly okay. However, going from 250 to 750 lbs would be a ludicrous goal, so B’s improvement will be a lot worse, when expressed in percent.

With regards to the Future Authoring Program, the same holds. If you are already used to setting goals and working towards them, then you may not get as much out of it as someone who hasn’t realized yet that he can improve his lot in life by working towards a goal. As a reader of this blog you are much more likely to be in the former camp, though, so you may justifiably be skeptical with regards to the value of Peterson’s product.

Personally, I found the Future Authoring writing exercise valuable as it helped me organize my thoughts on my goals and also question some of them, as you are also asked to describe why you want to achieve them. I won’t go into details, but one big takeaway for me was to no longer bother with a particular activity I used to engage in because there was no longer any utility in it. I simply put time into it due to habit. As a consequence, I was able to free up a chunk of spare time, which I’ve now partly dedicated to writing more frequently — not necessarily this blog, and not necessarily under this pseudonym. Furthermore, I picked up chess again, but more casually. Just based on that outcome alone, Future Authoring was worth it.

Did you like this article? Excellent! If you want to support what I am doing, then please consider buying my books or donating to the upkeep of this site. If you want tailored advice, I am available for one-on-one consultation sessions.

8 thoughts on “My experience with Jordan Peterson’s Future Authoring Program

  1. Unrelated, but I had been engaging in regular chess games using the app. There’s a matchmaking system based on points and a wide variety of different parameters to choose from.

    1. I’m on Lichess, which has the benefit that it is free. It likewise has a ranking system based on Elo, and many features, like a tactics trainer, a very large collection of videos, or optional engine analysis of your games. On a side note, I prefer the study of chess tactics with books that select problems based on theme and order them in increasing difficulty.

  2. Thank you for pointing this out, Aaron!

    I am also a Peterson-Fan (now i was a bit disappointed about his “pathetic weasels” quote, but he back pedalled on this one recently).

    As far as i understand it, you only have experience with the “future authoring” product – has anyone first hand experience with one of the other programs?

  3. I did the program and benefitted IMMENSELY. The difference before and after wasn’t night and day, but the level of focus on my goals ratcheted up immediately in a way that I’ve never experienced.

    One caveat: he noted that men who grew up without fathers benefitted to a greater degree than those from two-parent households, and I grew up without a father.

    1. Thanks for sharing! Your statement is similar to the observation that those who are doing less well are likely to benefit more from interventions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.