I was just alerted by a commenter that the UK government is going to criminalize approaching women in public. They use the terms “street harassment” and “public sexual harassment”. This is a really big problem, as you can glean from the following excerpt:
“Every woman should feel safe to walk our streets without fear of harassment or violence,” Home Secretary Suella Braverman said in a statement Friday. “And that is why we are supporting this bill to introduce a specific offence on public sexual harassment.”
She said that the matter was a “complex issue” but that the government has “carefully considered the arguments.”
“We are putting the needs of victims at the heart of our decision, which will mean the criminals who commit these acts face the consequences they deserve,” she said.
Those guys will face the consequences they deserve. There you have it, the United Kingdom is going to finally change course and protect its citizens. I guess that tackling knife crime in London was too tall an order, so they need to start with a simpler task.
Of course, there are some implications that are perhaps not readily available:
First, this law will primarily be enforced against white men. If you belong to a protected minority, you can set up structures for organized raping of women and it will take about three decades for anybody to start investigating.
Second, handsome men are, of course, not affected by any of this. It is only ugly and unattractive men, which is up to the woman to decide, who will be punished. Chads got a “loicense” for hitting on women, but said license can be revoked by any woman at any time.
Third, men are already getting less and less interested in dating women, for various issues. With this new law, even fewer men will bother with it. This is all fine because the goal of the WEF is to reduce CO2 emissions, and every (white) baby that does not get born is a net positive for society.
As you can see, the elites are, once again, working towards creating a better world for all of us.
5 thoughts on “Legal Breakthrough: Approaching Women as a Non-Chad Now a Crime in the UK!”
Notice that, as usual with a lot of this retarded legislation, it gets justified with a case (the murder of Sara Everard) where this law would have been utterly irrelevant.
Are doctors and engineers approaching to many unattractive fat women that the gov had to step in?
I think this law is targeting doctors and engineers at all. Presumably, the feminist masterminds behind this legislation think that if they outlaw unattractive men approaching them, then all the Chads will come out of hiding and chase after them.
This doesn’t actually criminalize any new behavior, it increases the penalty under certain circumstances. The behavior that is illegal is:
“A person is guilty of an offence if, with intent to cause a person harassment, alarm or distress, he—
(a)uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or
(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, thereby causing that or another person harassment, alarm or distress.”
The punishment is a fine or up to six months in prison.
What this does is that if:
“A carried out the conduct referred to in section 4A(1) because of the relevant person’s sex (or presumed sex).”
…then the punishment is stiffer (up to 1 year on summary conviction), and the offense also becomes indictable for a punishment of up to 2 years.
So the goal is to give stiffer punishment when the offense is based on sex. The law is gender neutral, but anyone wanna bet which sex will more often have stiffer sentences imposed on them? 🙂
There is always a difference between the written law and its application. The elites (and the cultural narratives they promote) decide how this law will be enforced. I predict it will be used against unattractive white males but Pakistani men and chads will get away with actual sexual harassment. Actually chads still get rejected so eventually white chads will find a woman that wants to lock them up.
The law is purposely vague. Interrupting a woman while she is using headphones can be considered “disorderly behavior.”