I came across a very amusing post on the MGTOW forum on Reddit today. I couldn’t track down the original, so it’s quite possible it got deleted. Anyway, it’s a post by a woman who was unaware that her boyfriend whored her out for money. She thought she’s just having threesomes with her boyfriend and some random dudes, and didn’t even realize that something odd is going on when he told her she could fuck some random dude, without her boyfriend even present. The thread is called “Using your whore girlfriend for some additional income”. Here’s the relevant screenshot:
That girl raises an interesting philosophical question: If a piece of information changes your interpretation of past behavior, which you happily and willingly engaged in, can you honestly be upset about it? For you budding lawyers out there: If you unknowingly engage in illegal behavior, can you get prosecuted? In law school and reality the answer is probably “no, you can’t” because of the rough childhood of that woman, or any other extenuating circumstances of which there never is a shortage when it comes to non-whites or non-males. The legal texts I know would view that differently, but why bother with law and order anymore nowadays?
That oblivious whore enjoyed all her fucking around and was probably happy she could get dick outside her relationship. I think she’s only upset about the fact that she didn’t directly get any of the money she made her pimp-boyfriend. What I find most amusing is that she wants to go to the police because she “agreed to the sex so they didn’t rape me”. Sure, that’s probably why she “was cool with” her pimp leaving her with customers for the night. In a Western country she would have a case because when prostitution is illegal, the woman is of course suppressed, while the man represents the patriarchy and needs to be punished. In a saner legal system, though, a whore who would want to go to the police and state that she’s been prostituting herself without knowing it should get locked up right away.
Did you like this article? Excellent! If you want to support what I am doing, then please consider buying my excellent books, the latest of which are Sleazy Stories II and Meditation Without Bullshit or donating to the upkeep of this site. If you want tailored advice, I am available for one-on-one consultation sessions.
Mens Rea. This woman had no intent to have sex for money.
They will find some law to prosecute him. Exloitation or whatever.
She’s only upset because of the social stigma on prostitution. Sleeping around in a open relationship is somehow deemed empowering in the feminist brain. Totally cool to cuck the boyfriend. As long the boyfriend has the submissive role. But being pimped is not deemed empowering. Basically the only difference is the guy making money. She’s a cum dumpster in both cases. But now she can blame someone else for her behaviour and play the victim. (This happened on large scale with dutch girls with immigrant guys)
Yeah pretty weird but disagree with “…any other extenuating circumstances of which there never is a shortage when it comes to non-whites or non-males”
I think pimping your sister out, shagging your sister-in-law, weirdo fetishes, druggies, thieves, and other ‘extenuating circumstances’ are very common among whites and often when these things are spoken of the assumptions are ‘must be white people’.
Even this cucking thing is a mostly white phenomena.
Trailer trash, genocide, pedophiles are a close run between whites and that other lot, many other shitty things are common among whites.
Basically non-whites is a bit too general and it might be better if you actually get specific with what extenuating circumstances and what ‘non-white’ people?