While some people consider Stefan Molyneux a “philosopher” and sing praises of him, my opinion of him is a bit less enthusiastic. It’s entertaining to listen to him, sure, but I rarely find myself not delegating his conversations to the background. His language is rather fluffy and he assumes the moral high horse a bit too often. The biggest problem, though, is that he speaks with a certainty that is simply unjustified. I find this rather baffling as that is not what you would expect from someone who has undergone rigorous academic philosophical training in the analytic tradition. In that regard, he is a lot closer to someone
trained brainwashed in your typical mediocre leftist university.
One such example of Stefan Molyneux making an absolutely outlandish claim and not backing it up in the least can be found in the video I embedded in my last post, Stefan Molyneux vs Single Mom Trainwreck. At one point, he seemingly breaks the fourth wall, addressing the presumably male listener, and admonishing with, saying that “young men break girls with their penises”. That is one ham-fisted metaphor gone wrong, but let’s ignore that.
Stefan Molyneux provides no justification for his statement but instead postulates it as absolute truth. No, not Western whores are to blame if guys pump and dump them, instead Chad and Brad need to be chastized for “breaking” all ’em bitches with their boners. What a bunch of baloney! Listen, Stefan Molyneux, the problem is not with Chad and Brad but with Western whores. Of course red-headed males want to get laid. We can take this as fact. However, if Western women wouldn’t spread their legs so readily, Chad and Brad would have to do what their horny grandfathers had to do, before the
sexual liberation great whorification of the West, namely pay a trivial amount of money to fuck a whore. How many women did Brad Sr. and Chad Sr. “break” with their jigglestick? How about a grand total of zero because the first and only women they fucked without paying were their wives?
The problem is that today’s Western whore does it for free, so instead of going to hookers, Brad just pulls some slut from the local club, week after week. Chances that he’ll settle down with any one of them are slim as none of them are wife material. However, not all women are like that. There is still a conservative minority around. Thus, the only women Brad could “break” are worthless broken whores anyway.
But where do all those worthless Western whores come from? That’s right, they largely come from single mother households. Therefore, instead of trying to shame Brad for banging all the sluts that are queuing up to gobble down his cock, we should instead take a long hard look at how broken Western society is. Of course girls who grow up in broken homes are vulnerable. They witness their mom bringing home strange men, so how should little slutty Susie figure out that it’s better for her if she keeps her legs together? Long gone are the days were daddy and mommy would point to some strumpet who got fucked by every other guy in the neighborhood and who ended up alone and miserable. Susie isn’t getting that lesson anymore. Instead, she’ll call in to Stefan Molyneux’ show, wondering why her life is such an incredible mess.
I’d like to ask the philosopher king Stefan Molyneux how Chad with his thundercock would be able to “break” broken girls that come from broken homes and who have grown up in a broken society? He can’t because those girls were already lost. Besides, let’s not blame good ol’ white Chad. The much bigger problem is that Western society has disintegrated so much that there are now gangs of Muslims operating who engage in large-scale systematic child abuse, operating at industrial scale. The muzzies of Rotherham, UK, went through well over 1,000 girls in about 20 years, for instance. Compared to that, a young virile stud pumping and dumping a few Western whores before setting down, or going MGTOW, is not even worth mentioning. Besides, it’s by far the better outcome for Susie anyway.