Entertainment · Subversion

Scorsese’s Killers of the Flower Moon (2023) is Abject Anti-White Propaganda

Hollywood is a mere shadow of itself. Long gone are the days when leftist propaganda was carefully hidden in plain sight, but not shoved right in your face. Arguably, the majority of the output of Hollywood has always been garbage, but a few directors managed to rise above the rest and produce more than just horrible drivel. I do not have the impression that there has been any director of note within the last twenty years or so, which means that the great names of the past nowadays have an almost mystical aura that surrounds them. Martin Scorsese is one of these people. Of course he released a few stinkers, but on average, his work is pretty darn impressive. Even in his old age, he is at the top of his game. I really liked The Wolf of Wall Street (2013) and The Irishman (2019). Incidentally, both are among the relatively few movies I have watched more than once.

I was not even aware that Scorsese had a new movie coming out. Thus, I was quite surprised when I heard of Killers of the Flower Moon (2023). As it so happened, I ended up watching it on release day, and what a bad day it was. Killers of the Flower Moon, based on a totally true story, is about the Indian tribe of the Osage, and their difficult relationship with whitey. This movie basically has three kinds of characters: (1) good, honorable Osage women, (2) wise Osage men, and (3) utterly horrible if not demonic white men. A forth, special category, consists of members of the federal government who are all honest and morally upright, to a fault. More on them later. The Osage somehow ended up with lots and lots of money for selling their land. They subsequently adopted the lifestyle of the white man, but were not suited for it, which leads to their inevitable demise. However, not only can the Osage not handle liquor, they are also unfit to deal with the debased criminal machinations of white men.

Killers of the Flower Moon tells us that Osage women cannot help but fall for white men. There is probably something magical about their dicks that makes them forget about their heritage and ignore their own men. Those women all end up marrying whitey, but whitey only marries them for two reasons: first, in order to get the “oil money” that they Osage got, presumably from nowhere because it could not have come from white men. Second, the white man also wants to “genocide” the Osage via intermarriage. I kid you not, this is really a theme of this movie. It is even explicitly mentioned, i.e. the Osage “disappear” because their women marry white men and thus their bloodline dies.

The white men in this movie are thoroughly evil. The mastermind is played by Robert DeNiro. He encourages Leonardo DiCaprio’s character to marry some Osage woman, and together, they and their henchmen systematically murder the Osage. This is not an exaggeration. They shoot them from behind, one after the other, just as they blow up their houses, one after the other. As a consequence, whitey gets more and more of the Osage money, both directly via inheritance but also indirectly via taking out life insurance on them before murdering them.

The main story is about Leonardo DiCaprio’s character, a poor taxi driver, who ends up marrying a rich Osage woman. He wants to slowly murder her by tainting her medicine with poison, which is a rather female way of killing someone. The movie tries tugging at your heartstrings by showing how this pure, innocent woman physically deteriorates due to the drip feed of poison administered by her husband.

You may think that the Osage are lost and that whitey is just going to murder them all. However, this is not quite what happens. As you all know, there is one force in the world above all that ensures that there is law and order, and that evil men are getting put behind bars. This incorruptible force is of course the federal government, which just gets dropped into the plot, like a deus ex machina. After enough of the Osage have died under mysterious circumstances, the US government has enough and sends its best men to get to the bottom of it. Yes, Daddy Government saves the day and ends up protecting the Osage from the evil, murderous white man who is genociding the Osage with his penis, guns, or bombs! Remember, kiddos, without Daddy Government, there would be none of the Osage left, and evil white men would still run the show. This is why it is so important that we put Trump behind bars in the current year!

Quite frankly, Killers of the Flower Moon is a really crappy movie. Without any exaggeration, I have never watched a movie with such simplistic characters: Osage good, white men bad, government good! I do not recall a lot of white women in this movie. Thus, either there are virtually none or they are simply insignificant. They would only detract from the Osage women anyway. For a supposedly high-brow director like Martin Scorsese, this movie has a surprisingly simplistic story. Oh, the book this movie is based on came out in 2017, i.e. during the reign of Trump, and was written by a Jew. Imagine how surprised I was when I learned that! The worst part, though, is that Killers of the Flower Moon takes about 3.5 hours. I had been invited to this movie, so I could not just get up and leave. Otherwise, I most probably would have walked out before the one-hour mark. Killers of the Flower Moon is one of the worst movies I have ever watched.

20 thoughts on “Scorsese’s Killers of the Flower Moon (2023) is Abject Anti-White Propaganda

  1. I saw the trailer as a random add on YouTube. I thought: well the trailer looks interesting. Then I searched for it on Wikipedia and directly knew that it was woke nonsense as you describe.

    1. I dug around a bit on Wikipedia, and look what I found: A few days ago, the entry for this movie prominently featured the following premise:

      “At the turn of the 20th century, oil brought a fortune to the Osage Nation, who became some of the richest people in the world overnight. The wealth of these Native Americans immediately attracted white interlopers, who manipulated, extorted, and stole as much Osage money as they could before resorting to murder.”

      I really wonder why this premise was first added, then removed. Perhaps the ultra-leftist editors of Wikipedia realized that this is too much, even for their standards. Seriously, fuck this movie.

      Oh, I just recalled that the whites an the movie also overcharge the Osage for everything, presumably by a factor of well over 100. There is a scene in the beginning, where an Osage woman is said to have spent over 700 dollars on groceries, when a dollar was worth probably 250 times as much as today, and later on there is a heated exchange involving DiCaprio’s character in which he accuses a merchant to charge him “Osage prices.”

  2. Scorsese owed the people who run Hollywood for the line “Jew mother fucker” from Joe Pescie in the Irishman.

    1. I was just wondering whether Leo/De Niro/Scorsese were cucked enough to want to do this or if Mephistopheles had to let them know they were behind on the vig again.

    2. Casino seems like a good movie to watch after the abominable Killers of the Flower Moon. I think it has been about twenty years since I watched it.

    3. Casino is a fantastic movie. It’s about three hours long, so it took me three days to watch it. I don’t think I will write a review on it, but I may do a deep-dive on Joe Pesci’s character, i.e. Nicky Santoro.

    4. Just to clarify …Pesci called a character in Casino that.

      But this DuhCrapio, DuhZero, Scumsayzee movie is nothing but revisionist history white hate.

  3. Sounds like Drillers of the Sour Poon is a real dud. I can’t say I’m too surprised seeing as the super woke De Niro and DiCaprio are featured in the film. DiCaprio has another Western called The Revenant which has some pretty “evil whitey” shit in it. Tom Hardy’s character, for example, even refers to American Indians as “tree-niggers”, which is a term I’ve never heard before until watching that film. It actually doesn’t even make sense to me to call them that.

    Btw, if Rotten Tomatoes is anything to go by then the audience reviews are quite disappointing. So much for go woke, go broke.

    1. It wouldn’t surprise me a bit to learn Rotten Tomatoes has been compromised. Hell, they’d be derelict if they hadn’t done it by now.

    2. This reminds me that a few years ago I was on a corporate team-building call. This is part and parcel of living in a modern dystopia. We were supposed to share something about our private life. This is bad for anyone who is not a total NPC. In 2020, I told people that I love reading and that I was engrossed in that WEF Jew’s book “Sapiens”. I took this cue from all the idiots who name-dropped this book. If two people tell the group that they love that book, you can certainly be the third one. Anyway, next up was this token female hire and she tells us that she loves MCU movies, going into a little story about how she is looking forward to each new one, and how they all fit together, calling them “cinematic masterpieces”. Thankfully, I was on mute. I burst out in laughter and hurriedly turned off my camera.

    3. Regarding women and entertainment, I just remembered a somewhat “highly educated” woman telling a group about a super interesting book she was reading by the title The Other Einstein. Regardless of what you think of the man, the chick was spewing about how much of an injustice it was that Einstein had basically taken all of his wife’s theories and published them in his name. I later looked up the book and some ditz had written it, but it clearly stated in the description that it was a work of historical fiction. Yet, this super smart and educated woman was apparently unable to discern that the book is really just some female power/victim fantasy or whatever. You can’t make this stuff up.

    4. Quite a few women seem to completely lack the ability to question the written word. Back when I briefly tried to have actual conversations with women and readily revealed my power level, some of them just copied-and-pasted some garbage from somewhere that was vaguely related to what I had said or written, and they assumed that this somehow meant that they had won the argument. This puzzled me for a bit but I quickly realized that nobody ever told those women that they were stupid. Guys just wanted to get into their pants. This had the bizarre result that those IQ95 broads, if at that, had the self-image of being intellectual giants.

    5. After too many of the woke MCU movies had gotten audience reviews that were quite opposite to the opinion of critics, Rotten Tomatoes began deleting “dissenting” reviews. This happened a few years ago already. Thus, you can ignore this site nowadays. The movie did not particularly well at the box office and I can’t quite see it gain a cult following.

  4. Oh dear God… I should have read all the reviews you folks have posted. Didn’t have anything to do on Boxing Day…so the wife and mother-in-law announced that thy had paid nearly $30 to watch this shitty movie.
    WTF… what a revolting piece of shit this “movie” was … revisionist history is a helluva thing!
    To hell with all the scumbag leftard “actors” in this crappy movie … this POS flick just reinforced my view that they are all steaming piles of horse shit!

    BLAAAH…how does one bleach this garbage from one’s mind??
    Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.