I live in a big, degenerate city, at least for the time being because I am currently gearing up for the final stage of my existence: hermit life, which consists of living in relative isolation. Or perhaps I will bugger off to SEA. Anyway, one of the perks of big-city life is that you see dirt, drugs, and diversity everywhere you go. Even though my district is solidly middle-class, I often cannot walk for more than five minutes until I smell the stench of weed.
On one of my recent walks, I overheard two women in their late teens or early twenties lively discuss SCOTUS bitch-slapping abortion activists. Both women looked totally unfuckable but as their conversation pertained to my interests, I slowed down so that I could listen in for a bit. One girl made an impassioned remark about US soft power (lol) and why this means that laws in Europe may soon reflect this new reality in the US. This is where you get a friendly reminder that it is by design that we let idiots teach our kids. US influence is not due to “soft power” but countless military bases all over the world. The US occupies all of Europe; you can rightly call the major European economies US puppet states.
The remark on US soft power was laughable and the other girl was not interested in hearing about it either. Thinking about her imagined vaginal pleasures, she spouted out that “women need access to abortions because there are no safe contraceptives”. This is a very revealing comment. She went in to some detail, saying that she recently looked up the rate of unwanted pregnancies based on contraceptive method and did not like that “not even the pill is 100% safe”. This chick did not look as is she could have a lot of sex, certainly not with Chads, but her remark nonetheless seems to imply that she viewed abortion as a contraceptive! Recall that the mainstream line is that abortions are a way out in the case of an “accidental” pregnancies. It is not an accident if you deliberately take the risk, though, and even less if you take this risk week after week.
Let us think a bit more about it: considering that it is not that easy to get pregnant for women, it is safe to say that some chick who wants to whore around could do so at relative ease. She is only fertile for a few days each month and even then there is no 100% guarantee that she will get knocked up. Thus, women could skip all contraception, take as much raw dick as they want and if they end up pregnant, they just get an abortion. Surely you recall those many girls you fucked who insisted that you do not need to use a condom. Of course you don’t as there is no risk for her. Yes, she can get pregnant, but this may very well be what she wants. She can use pregnancy as a joker to get you to commit, and if she then realizes that you are not drowning in money, she will just go for an abortion. Thus, access to abortion enables an utterly sickening dating strategy where she can engage in risk sexual behavior with guys who seem to be suitable providers but whom she could not properly vet yet. She does not know if the guy with the fancy sports car is really rich or knee-deep in debt, but by engaging in unprotected sex that may result in pregnancy, she gains valuable time for due diligence. If she did not do that, this guy would just fuck some other chick.
Once someone sent me a link to reddit posts where women bragged about their abortions. One chick posted a picture of all the ultrasound images of the fetuses she aborted, and another one had a collection of their aborted fetuses. They were conserved somehow. It was a genuinely revolting sight. I am not sure what I was even looking at as I have a hard time believing that those abortion centers just hand over any fetus they pulled out of her vagina. (Perhaps she blew the abortion doctor.) Those abortion centers have deals with big pharma who just buys fetuses. Probably piles of them also get deep-fried and are served as appetizers at Davos dinners. It would not surprise me in the slightest.
The thought that women use abortion as a some kind of contraceptive had not occurred to me, but it is of course understandable that such twisted female minds would make use of abortions this way. If a woman’s dating life is built on this strategy then they justifiably are in a state of panic in response to the recent SCOTUS ruling on abortion. Of course, the standard claim is that women who get an abortion only do so because they got accidentally pregnant, or got raped. Yet, what if the former is only a minuscule number and most women who get casual abortions do so because this is simply part of their contraceptive strategy? How would society view abortions if we could prove, and effectively communicate, that 95% of abortions happen because women just do not want to use contraception, for all the benefits outlined above?
15 thoughts on “Abortion as Contraception”
In a book by E. Michael Jones I once read the gnomic pharase that (quotting from memory) all of modernity is in fact “rationalized sexual misbehaviour and degemeracy”.
The aspect outlined serves as a great point in case. Women (and men for that matter – but in this case the control of the gatekeepers of sex lies with women) can only live this “lifestyle” of urban modernity and slut it up Yolo-way, if nothing really matters and consequences don’t ever exist. I.e. a world of relativism and of childish, solipsistic hedonism. “Free sex” is the core essence and prime motivater of such a lifestyle, everything in modern Western society either leads to “liberated sexuality, or serves to legitimize it. Hence “Free sex” is only possible when contraception and eventually abortion becomes freely available and its use accepted practice. The fierce female and cucked male resistance against the prohibition of all kinds of abortion and euthanasia btw. only proves, that this prohibition is the death nail for Western yolo lifestyle. If it gets taken away women (and men) will be forced to admit that Sex IS serious, that relativity is an illusion (and self-refuting), that things are not trivial, that Truth exists, that Yolo-hedonism misses the mark of this existence and leads to absolutely nothing but destruction – and that even this destruction matters.
“The fierce female and cucked male resistance against the prohibition of all kinds of abortion and euthanasia btw. only proves, that this prohibition is the death nail for Western yolo lifestyle. If it gets taken away women (and men) will be forced to admit that Sex IS serious, that relativity is an illusion (and self-refuting), that things are not trivial, that Truth exists, that Yolo-hedonism misses the mark of this existence and leads to absolutely nothing but destruction – and that even this destruction matters.”
Let me play Devil’s Advocate as my favorite blogger Advocatus Diaboli would do !!!
For the sake of argument, sex is dangerous because of the risk of pregnancy and the risk of disease. If one can eliminate the risk of pregnancy, IE only fuck old ladies or barren broads and use testing as the pornography industry does, than one can have tons of sex without guilt and without consequences. So, hypothetically, abortion could be made illegal but we could boink old ladies and trannies with NO GUILT !!!
I have visited lady boys in my travels and they will often give a discount with superior service. I have ben tempted, when the opportunity arose for sex without the condom. I have, also enjoyed being “topped” after too many drinks by one who has not had the surgery yet. It’s ben luck but so far no STD’s !!!
I do have to say the tranny option will be a great option for those who want NSA and no drama that one invariably has with a woman born a woman !!!
Your last remark about bonking trannies instead of women to avoid female drama may seem like a joke, but I have come across men making such claims. This was in the context of Thai sex tourism. There are stories floating around about guys getting tricked into taking a tranny back to their hotel but there seems to be a significant minority of men that actively seeks out trannies.
@ P Ray: That’s a great comment, I hadn’t thought of that way out of the dilemma! But then again you could even doggy-style a goat and get your rocks off. So why even bother with actual humans? A flesh light might do the trick too.
I must admit that I myself do feel conflicted on this issue. In my teens I remember feeling so horny at times, that I phantasized about what it would be like to fuck freshly buried girls and creepy stuff like that… Being a manwhoring horndog myself I can on the one hand capitalize on the loose morals of our age and on the fact, that most other men are considered unattractive and weak performers in the sack by women. On the other hand there is massive destructive potential inherent in human sexuality. Wartimes e.g. have always been providing “good examples” for this destructive sexual power.
My guess is that most people instinctively understand that sex has to be regulated by reason, otherwise a man turns into nothing but a slave to his passions. (In this regard rejection by a woman is good and beneficial because it can serve to rcegulate and curb one’s own desires.) After all, biography *is* destiny. And degeneration always starts with sexual perversion. Controlling one’s own passions is certainly easier said than done! But the issue at the core of Western yolo-civilization remains: Just how much are we willing to pay for “sexual liberation”? Is it worth death – either individually or collectively?
“Your last remark about bonking trannies instead of women to avoid female drama may seem like a joke, but I have come across men making such claims. This was in the context of Thai sex tourism. There are stories floating around about guys getting tricked into taking a tranny back to their hotel but there seems to be a significant minority of men that actively seeks out trannies.”
Matt Ferny didn’t know they were trannies even though their voices were deeper than his and they were tall for Flip wimmenz. Or he did know and went with it, hehe.
Yeah, I banged and got banged by trannies. It’s not gay because they don’t want to be dudes. It would actually be gayer to bang that lady/man that triggered Proffesor Peterson by getting his/her kitties cute off !!!
Getting sodomized as a man by either another dude or by a woman with a strap-on dildo – either way, it is gay. Don’t trick yourself into thinking otherwise.
“Getting sodomized as a man by either another dude or by a woman with a strap-on dildo – either way, it is gay. Don’t trick yourself into thinking otherwise.”
I used to share your bigoted thinking, but then I read Advocatus Diabolo’s (now defunct) blog where he talked about ass play and how good an escorts fingers or tongue felt on your butthole. I tried it and he was right. My orgasms are so much more intense, you don’t know what you are missing !!!
@ P Ray: I’m certainly not gonna discuss my sexual preferences with you.
Do as you must, that’s your responsibility.
As far as the former blog of “Advocatus Diaboli” is concerned, I remember it quite well, I even saved more than a few of his write-ups. He was a proponent of MGTOW before the acronym even had been coined. He openly advocated for sex with hookers over any “regular” entanglements with the fairer sex. Now, that’s in no way a new idea, so he kept beating a dead horse and appeared quite a bit overzealous in doing so. Granted, he resides in North America and hat to deal with the terrible degeneration of Western women in the belly of the globalist beast firsthand. Still, he never struck me as a man was or is particularly successful in bedding women. I’d say it’s different thing if a guy, who’s successful in getting laid proactively also fucks whores on the side or does some A/B-testing and then shares his insights. I’ve fucked my fair share of prostitutes on the side, but I’d never advocate for going whorehouse only.
“Advocatus Diaboli” also openly identified as a nihilist (which is never a good idea btw). So him being a nihilist, why should his views even matter to anyone, huh?
What I am saying is, since you cannot infer an Ought from an Is, you should rather apply a bit more circumspection when taking content from internet blogs etc. too seriously. That you’ve come to personally like some sexual treatment is merely a biographical anecdote, but not a justification by any means.
“What I am saying is, since you cannot infer an Ought from an Is, you should rather apply a bit more circumspection when taking content from internet blogs etc. too seriously. That you’ve come to personally like some sexual treatment is merely a biographical anecdote, but not a justification by any means.”
Ah, yes, you seem familiar, you were a thorne in m my side and left scathing insults when I left insightful commentary. If you were less articulate, I would suspect you were that cretin Stonah With ah Bonah !!!
In fact your blatant homophobia is similar to his alongside the arrogance and hubris !!!
There is nothing “gay” about seeking pleasure from a beautiful ladyboy that brings no risk of pregnancy nor the entrapment of a relationshit !!!
Go back to your delivery job and hope that a 40 something milf will touch your weiner and not ask for too much in return you blue all chump !!!
@P-Ray, there’s nothing homophobic in stating the plain fact that enjoying any form of “bottom” sexual act is gay as fuck. You’re a bisexual, deal with it. And maybe you’ll go back to commenting like a smart person as before, you’re getting a bit too woke with Lucretius. I say this in the friendliest of spirits, and with no baggage from past keyboard battles.
I am Not Woke, let me repeat NOT WOKE !!!
Do you consider Milo Yianopolis woke ?!?!
IDK if having sex with a Ladyboy makes me bi or not and I really don’t care, it’s too much fun to stop doing because someone on the internet is offended or more likely jealous.
I can say that having a finger or toy stuck in your butt does not make you gay, maybe be open minded and enjoy yourself a little !!!
Jeaslous? Offended? I can’t speak for Lucretius, but with me you’re really reaching. All I’m saying is, let’s call a spade a spade, and that’s it. AFAIK, Milo’s not going around telling people that getting it in the ass is not inherently gay.
Last thing I’ll say on this matter.
if you fuck a lady boy thats not gay, but being fucked by a lady boy is a different thing why dont you go to grindr and let a guy sodomize you, maybe you will like it , fucking a guy once out of curiosity is not gay at all! .
“Last thing I’ll say on this matter.”
I politely disagree with your viewpoint, I could break down the nuances but it would be nearly academic at this point as you have nothing else to say.
Have a good Day !!!
“if you fuck a lady boy thats not gay, but being fucked by a lady boy is a different thing why dont you go to grindr and let a guy sodomize you, maybe you will like it , fucking a guy once out of curiosity is not gay at all! ”
I don’t find men attractive but I think Ladyboys are the bee’s knee’s !!!
I would let a woman bang me with a strap on if she promised to be gentle though,
Are you the David who posted on the Left Wing Male Advocates discord server?
If so, I got some crazy stories for you !!!