In my last article I briefly wrote about Jamal having more kids than even a guy like Mel Gibson who has fathered nine children. Of course, Jamal can only do this because he is living high on the largess of the taxpayer. Here is a key excerpt:
In the West, most children are born in the underclass and as long as we do not fundamentally change society, i.e. scrap the welfare state, this will continue until the system collapses. Nonetheless, for the time being, Jamal who brandishes an IQ of 80 as well as a semi-automatic rifle, makes some dough on the side by slinging dope, and knocks up chicks in exchange for free weed or crystal meth is going to leave more children behind than any of us. He even makes an Ultra-Chad like Mel Gibson look like an amateur. In the end, society will pay for Jamal’s brood of 25 kids with 20 women. In the spirit of accelerationism, I wish him all the best, though.
Let me riff on this theme a bit more. Probably most of you are familiar with r/Kselection strategy, which has been observed in the animal kingdom. In short, some species have a lot of offspring, and invest little to no energy on them (r), and even if most of their offspring do not make it the effect is minimal as there are so many of them. In contrast, other species are K strategists that invest a lot into a small number of offspring (K), in order to ensure their survival. As you can imagine, there is a clear correlation between r/K selection strategy and your ability to plan for the future. The more you are oriented toward the present, the less you will be disturbed about your lack of steady income, insufficient housing, or the fact that you live in a crime-infested neighborhood. Those questions may not even register on your radar.
A problem with the modern welfare state is that it has created some kind of welfare aristocracy, albeit you should probably call it something else as the word aristocracy means “rule of the best”. There is no viable system that is based on rule of the worst, so such a term seems to be sadly missing in our lexicon. Judging how things are going, we will probably need to come up with one such term sooner or later. In any case, in the modern welfare state the productive members of society get burdened with excessive taxes, in particular the middle class. All that money is used to stuffing the pockets of Jamal and Tyrone who get free food, shelter, and housing without needing to do anything in exchange.
Perversely, people can live really well on welfare. In Germany, a family of two in the welfare class has a lifestyle it could only achieve if they held the kind of job that they would, generally, be unable to get as they are not qualified for them. Thus, you perpetuate this kind of lifestyle generation after generation. Worse is that the more kids those people have, the more money they get from the taxpayer. Thus, they plausibly view their kids as little walking piggy banks. As the parents are on welfare, they also are entitled to ever bigger apartments, for free, and the kids get free breakfast and lunches at school because that kind of money can, obviously, not get taken out of the generous budget of your typical family living on welfare.
The definition of evolutionary success is not having the most offspring. Instead, evolutionary fitness means that you have the highest number of offspring that is able to have offspring themselves. Consequently, in the current year evolution clearly favors the underclass. Sure, this works only due to economic parasitism, i.e. their lifestyle is only possible because government has decided that it wants to humiliate you by taking your hard-earned money, giving it to the underclass, and mocking you for not procreating enough. Clearly, they therefore need to bring in millions of third-worlders because you hedonists cannot be bothered to have children. The elites are playing a truly sickening game with us.
When was the last time you saw a living dinosaur? Yes, me neither. The dinosaurs had their day in the sun, and eventually the planet got hit by an asteroid, according to science. This led to atmospheric changes that were no longer advantageous for those giant lizards, so the rise of mammals began. Similarly, the day in the sun of the underclass will eventually come to an end. It is a mathematical certainty because that kind of life form is only possible in an affluent society. We tell each other that we live in one, but if you are in your 30s or older, you can probably remember a time where everybody seems to have been clearly better off than they were today. When I was a kid, middle-income earners could easily afford a house, for instance. Today, that ship has sailed. As the welfare state comes to its inevitable end, so will the welfare aristocracy. This is not mere wishful thinking. Some countries, like Denmark, have been making great strides in ramping down welfare, in particular to third-world immigrants. Presumably, this has something to do with studies showing that those people, as a whole, only ever make a net negative contribution to society, regardless of age. Yes, Denmark really had its academics look into this. Change is coming.