I never thought I would use the words “attractive” and “59-year-old” in a sentence, yet here were are: Yesterday, the YouTube algorithm suggested I watch a video about the senate hearing of Trump’s new Attorney General who happens to be the very attractive 59-year-old Pam Bondi. Her full name is apparently Pamela Jo Bondi and I wonder if I have come across that name in porn because something is not quite right here. In any case, the YouTube algorithm succeeded in getting my attention. I simply wondered what joker put the image of a blonde porn slut in the video thumbnail. As I have a deep interest in US politics, I skipped through this video in an attempt to unravel this mystery. You can do this exercise for yourself. Here is the video:
Of course, as an embedded video, the thumbnail image is enlarged, so Pam Bondi maybe looks marginally less hot, but check out the video! This woman is 59 years old and looks about half her age, without any exaggeration. On top, she does not just look like a 30-year-old, she looks like a still-pretty-hot 30-year-old. More correctly, she looks like the kind of 30-year-old you would definitely bang. Amazingly, Pam Bondi does not have the voice of an old woman either. She obviously uses make up and most certainly had plenty of plastic surgery done. However, the same is true for basically every other female who is a public figure, so this is not a good argument.
Below are two pictures of Pam Bondi (“fair use” is assumed). I have taken them from other video thumbnails on YouTube. She definitely has the raunchy MILF look down. It is also quite revealing to compare Pam Bondi to formerly super-hot women. Let us start with boner queen Denise Richards, a woman so hot that the first-print edition of the Wild Things DVD came with a red sticker warning you that long-lasting full erections can lead to permanent damage of penile tissue. I do not even want to embed a picture of her at the age of 40, but feel free to check this Daily Mail article to see for yourself. Now I really wonder what Pam Bondi looked like at 25. If her current looks are any indication, then she should probably have been in Wild Things, asking Mr. Lombardo where his hose is.
Pam Bondi did not hit the wall. Apparently she did not even notice that there is one. Speaking of wall hitters, Michelle Trachtenberg, arguably the sexiest woman the Jewish race has ever produced, judging by her performance in EuroTrip, looks like total crap nowadays and she is not even 40 years old yet. Wikipedia has a picture of her at 33. In it, she is about as sexually attractive as the trash bin in my kitchen. Between Michelle Trachtenberg at 33 and Pam Bondi at 59, you would know whom to pick.
.jpg){kind=link}
The playing field is not even. A regular woman without the financial means of Pam Bondi will obviously not be able to get copious amounts of cosmetic surgery. Make-up is expensive, too. Well, you can rest assured that the typical well-off US female with connections also knows about cosmetic surgery or where to get adrenochrome or which clinics swap her blood with the blood of a child. All of that is a given. Yet, superior genes apparently very clearly have an effect well into old age. Most women are done at around 40, and for good evolutionary reasons. After their eggs have dried up, there is no longer any plausible evolutionary mechanism that would select for women to remain sexually attractive into middle age. In contrast, you almost wonder if Pam Bondi is still fertile. There surely is no shortage of men who would be curious to find an answer to that question.
I think that cosmetic surgery can be very effective. However, there are clear limits. I am not even aware of a single example where cosmetic surgery turned a genuinely unattractive man or woman into a Chad or Stacy. Sure, Elon Musk went from a 5/10 to, perhaps, a 7/10, and he has his many billions, too. Yet, he is far, far away from having the sexual appeal of a guy like Jeremy Meeks. Put pictures of, for instance, Michael Douglas at 60 next to Elon Musk at 40 and you cannot help but wonder if they belong to different species. With women, the effect of cosmetic surgery seems to be even more limited. Of course, Scarlet Johansson benefited from her nose job and whatever other small adjustments she got done, but even without that she was a 9 or a 10. For every Scarlet Johansson there are ten thousand vapid bitches who get lip fillers or butt implants. You cannot even say that a 6/10 who gets fake boobs even becomes more attractive as a consequence. Instead, you are looking at an ugly chick with fake boobs. Without a good genes, Pam Bondi would not look the way she does at her age, regardless of cosmetic surgery. It is really quite remarkable.
Over one million people watched (part of) her nomination on the Fox News YouTube channel in one day. There were probably quite a few men of culture among the viewers:
Compare this to (for example) the memes of Feinstein/Hirono/Gillibrand/Warren screeching at Hegseth. I’m always struck by the difference between our gals and theirs. Of course, there’s selection bias at work here. Physically and mentally healthy people do not gravitate to mental illnesses such as socialism/feminism/multicultism. But these also have corrosive effects, which I hardly need list here, leading to a vicious cycle. Perhaps most of all, fighting a constant war on reality is presumably going to etch your insanity on your face over time, in ways that plastic surgery cannot correct.
Here is a good example of a liberal California congresswoman. Not for the faint of heart:
https://images.app.goo.gl/LE7nFMXQc7sKck4B7
Despite the heads-up, I was quite taken aback. More amusingly, even though I knew that Maxine Waters is an ugly old hag, this was the first time I have looked at a fairly high-resolution picture of her. Thankfully, it has been a while since dinner. What an ugly woman!
“Speaking of wall hitters, Michelle Trachtenberg, arguably the sexiest woman the Jewish race has ever produced, judging by her performance in EuroTrip, looks like total crap nowadays and she is not even 40 years old yet.”
I’ve never heard of this chick before, but I think I prefer Natalie Portman in the first Star Wars prequel. There may have been a nose job involved with both actresses, though.
I just did a search and apparently Scarlett Johansson and Mila Kunis are the offspring of Eastern European and Russian Jews? I had no idea. In most cases of competently attractive Jewish actresses I suspect heavy caucasian admixture.
Yeah I knew Scarlett Johansson was a Jew. Phenotype and genotype don’t coincide as much as people think.
It’s like rolling dice. Snake eyes and box cars are very rare. But it does happen.
First Melania. Then Pam Bondi. Some more “change we can believe in”
Throw in Marisa Tomei as another 60-year-old woman who looks incredible for her age. What do they have in common? No children. Yep, childrearing invariably takes its toll. It’s like with atheism, I mean, both kids and religion have given meaning to life since the dawn of civilization but, since they’re not exactly basic needs, modernity seduces you to give them up by showing you they come with sacrifices.
This reminds me of my first proper girlfriend and her “mother”: the hottest 40-yo I’ve ever met, in better shape than the “daughter” even (hardly any wrinkles, thin, natural big boobs that were perky as no boobs that age and size should have permission to be, you get the picture). She was in reality her aunt, but she adopted my then-gf when she was a baby, so no pregnancies whatsoever. That was 6 years ago, so I wonder how she looks now.
“Throw in Marisa Tomei as another 60-year-old woman who looks incredible for her age. What do they have in common? No children.”
I’ll have to look for the link again, but if I recall correctly, I’ve read that there’s been scientific showings that the mother and the womb unfortunately have a “biologically antagonistic relationship”. Crude as it seems to say, but the baby is essentially a “parasite” and in order to develop to the fullest, it has to suck biological resources from the mother.
Many of the disastrous outcomes we’ve seen with post-pregnancy often comes as a result of the baby winning this “biological battle” too much according to that link. I’ve witnessed it myself as well IRL. Some women I used to know, after childbirth, very quickly hit the wall. Alek has commented about it before, mid-20’s women who look like they could pass for late 30’s or even 40’s! (Of course, the stresses and challenges of childrearing itself I’m sure also plays a significant factor, but I doubt that alone explains it.)
I suppose this is a good reason to support Artificial Wombs. I’m not sure if we are necessarily going to see this in our bachelor lives, but I’d say any man in the future interested in a family should opt for this in order to spare the wife (and her life. childbirth always has a potentially fatal risk) from that dreadful biological process that comes with pregnancy.
If artificial wombs ever become a viable, safe and AFFORDABLE option (it sounds like a technology that is bound to be useful only for the rich for some decades), great. But until then, let’s stop promoting that anyone with a modicum of intelligence dreads having children so only the scum of the Earth reproduces itself.
I doubt this sort of technology is going to stay super expensive/unavailable to the general public for very long. We’re not talking about some niche technology here for some niche purpose, we’re talking about something EVERYONE (assuming they’re not some insane tree hugger who opposes technology and thinks “natural = good”) wants/needs. Probably almost every woman out there is at least a little bit scared (and understandably so) of the pregnancy process. and no man wants to risk their wife dying or having their health seriously compromised if it can be avoided.
Of course, the poor is fucked no matter what in our capitalist society, but I can’t imagine it taking very long before the technology will be accessible to the middle class. I suppose the only way to know for sure is when we witness it hit the scene.
Our elites do a great job at manipulating people to make them believe that children are optional. Only after the creation of massive welfare states was it possible to get by without children. Of course, the government wants you to depend on it instead of your family, so keeping the birth rate down is in their best interest, at least in the short term. This is a form of learned helplessness.
On a related note, Kristin Kreuk at 40 is still quite a looker:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristin_Kreuk#/media/File:Kristin_Kreuk_Photo_Op_GalaxyCon_Columbus_2022_(cropped).jpg