Gaming · Subversion

Ubisoft’s Attempted Rewriting of History with Assassin’s Creed: Shadows

I recently watched the two videos below, which serve as a great example of how well-orchestrated the subversion attempts by the elites are. The context is Ubisoft’s the upcoming game Assassin’s Creed: Shadows. It plays in Japan during the Edo period and it somehow features a black samurai called Yasuke. (There is also a female character that features prominently, to nobody’s surprise.) This is a most peculiar choice because albeit there are historical traces of a black servant named Yasuke, he was definitely not a samurai. Painting him as a major historical figure is thus a somewhat odd choice. Thus, it seems quite obvious that Ubisoft intended Assassin’s Creed: Shadows to humiliate the Japanese.

As it turned out, the Japanese were not happy about Ubisoft enabling gamers to genocide them in a video game by controlling a black samurai. Even the government got involved. Ubisoft’s PR consists of nothing but lies and exaggerations. I chuckled when I read about the academic whose work Ubisoft used as the basis for their upcoming “AssCreed” game. The person in question is a guy called Thomas Lockley who just so happened to be Jewish, and his ancestors include a Jew of very flexible morals who became a pastor to survive. This is all just a total coincidence, of course, because claiming that Jews work on subverting society is nothing but an odious and utterly baseless right-wing accusation. Thomas Lockley seems to be an expert in “probable history”, more commonly known as “making shit up”. Without him and media companies pushing his work, nobody would know of the black servant, let alone black samurai, Yasuke. The Wikipedia page, which was primarily edited by Thomas Lockley, even has a section on “probable depictions”.

None of the claims made my Thomas Lockley seem to hold up under scrutiny. After he had been found out, he deleted all his social media accounts. Still, the media came to his rescue. Have a look at the second video, which gives examples of the mainstream attempting to slander gamers:

You see, if you question anything the mainstream tells you, no matter how nonsensical it appears to be, you are a right-wing extremist, moron, mouth-breather, and deserve to be “cancelled”. If Ubisoft does not make billions with AssCreed: Shadows, you are to blame for it. I wonder if Ubisoft’s lawyers have wet dreams about suing “gamers” for compensation if the aforementioned game does not meet sales targets. The claim would be easy to make, if you accept the premises of clown world: Ubisoft pushes diversity down your throat and gets supported by an “academic” as well as the mainstream. They project to sell X million copies, and everything is planned out. Some pesky gamers, though, don’t quite buy into the Yasuke story and cause a stir online. However, if the game sells less as a consequence, which has happened to a lot of woke games recently, would it not be plausible to argue that if nobody had stirred up a fuss over Thomas Lockley’s lies the next AssCreed would have sold the projected X million copies? No, I do not think that this argument holds but this is not up to me. All it takes is a woke judge who believes it.

2 thoughts on “Ubisoft’s Attempted Rewriting of History with Assassin’s Creed: Shadows

  1. I began a gaming kick a little over 3 weeks ago.

    This is why I’m playing titles from years ago, and have little interest in current generation gaming consoles.

    I enjoyed the first two Assassin’s Creed entries. What a waste. An opportunity to immerse oneself in history only for it to be diluted to the point of idiocy

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.