As I am currently on a Schwarzenegger binge, I watched Conan The Destroyer (1984) today. This movie did not get a particularly favorable critical reception, perhaps because it did not contain high-brow Nietzsche quotes, unlike the first one. Yet, if you have liked Conan the Barbarian (1982), you will most likely also enjoy its sequel, despite this obvious drop in literary qualities. If anything, Grace Jones, a black actress with unattractive facial features who plays a foreign warrior that is closer to animals in behavior than humans (how racist!) might be a distraction for you. Anyway, this movie has an interesting piece of eye candy, Princess Jehnna. Have a look at her:
It may surprise you, but this actress was either 14 years old in this shot, or had barely turned 15. Thus, you need to make sure that you adequately respond to such imagery. Here are some basic rules:
1) Do not get aroused!
2) Do not view this innocent little girl as a woman because she is not!
3) Understand that when you catch a glimpse at her secondary sexual organs, you actually see something else.
The third point bears repeating. Indeed, when you watch a scene like the following, there is a difference between perception and reality:
She is not craving Conan’s cock. Instead, she has an objective mind that allows her to study human anatomy in a disinterested manner. In the screenshot above you may have thought that you had seen tits but those were not tits. This is clearly a child, not a fully sexually matured woman. Thus, there can be absolutely no connection between her image and you having sexual thoughts. Do not find this woman attractive!
It really is time that we humans cement ourselves on the next level of evolution. Billions of years of evolution, since the time when there were only microbes on this planet, may work against us but we can still do it. If we have learned anything in the last thirty years, it is that women are not women, and tits are not tits. We have advanced so far that three decades of social engineering can easily win out over billions of years of evolution.
Furthermore, you have to understand that while little girls who look like women are not women and under no circumstances can be viewed as sex objects, the same reasoning does not apply to little boys. According to leftist activists and Democrat lawmakers, there is no such thing as pedophilia. Love between a man and a boy, or male toddler, or a male baby, is a wonderful thing, even if it leads to the transmission of monkey pocks. It is an even more precious thing when those love-starved boys in question have been adopted by a homosexual couple. This is normal. In contrast, a scene like the following absolutely is not:
I repeat, do not find this woman attractive! Your brain may trick you into believing that this is a woman at her sexual peak, but that is not true. We now know that women are only fully developed human beings once they are in their 30s, and it would be best if women only had children after their 35th birthday. If you think otherwise, you are a pedophile! In fact your pedophilic impulses are so wrong that they give leftist and Democrat boy-lovers a bad image. You are the problem, not them! You lusting after women younger than 35 is scandalous whereas leftists and Democrats desiring to give love to little boys, but being prosecuted for it, is a crime against humanity.