When you read the term “genocide”, you may think of Hitler’s systematic eradication of “the joos” (E. Cartman). However, genocide does not have to be organized in a manner as efficient as the Nazis did it. Probably the whiteys currently in charge in Europe no longer have the technical know-how and discipline to perform a systematic genocide. Yet, that’s no problem because a genocide does not need to be carried out in a very thorough manner. The left is low in conscientiousness, so setting up a system of death camps would be beyond their capabilities anyway. Instead, they just flood the continent with a few millions unassimilable savages and let time take care of the problem.
So, let’s look at what a few intellectuals say about genocide. You’ll probably find a few definitions slightly unsettling. The following is a selection of definitions taken from the Wikipedia article on that topic.
1) Lemkin (1944)
By “genocide” we mean the destruction of an ethnic group…. Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups….
Yup, that fits what’s going on in the US, Canada, UK, Germany, Sweden, France, and other Western countries to a T.
2) Nuremberg trials (1945)
They (the defendants) conducted deliberate and systematic genocide—viz., the extermination of racial and national groups—against the civilian populations of certain occupied territories in order to destroy particular races and classes of people, and national, racial or religious groups, particularly Jews, Poles, Gypsies and others
Absolutely. The European elites possesses nowhere near the intellectual brilliance of the leading Nazis of yore, so you can only expect them to do an utterly amateurish job. However, the destruction of races and classes of people, their national, racial and religious groups is happening, and it’s happening to us.
3) UN Assembly (1946)
Genocide is a denial of the right of existence of entire human groups.
Absolutely. Whites are not allowed to have their own countries, are being indoctrinated to not have children, and are told to breed with people with a brown or black skin.
4) UN Assembly (1948)
Any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
I highlighted the relevant parts we whites have been exposed to.
5) Dadrian (1975)
Genocide is the successful attempt by a dominant group, vested with formal authority and/or with preponderant access to the overall resources of power, to reduce by coercion or lethal violence the number of a minority group whose ultimate extermination is held desirable and useful and whose respective vulnerability is a major factor contributing to the decision for genocide.
You do recall that we whiteys are seen as the source of all evil, right?
6) Horowitz (1976)
[Genocide is] a structural and systematic destruction of innocent people by a state bureaucratic apparatus. …Genocide represents a systematic effort over time to liquidate a national population, usually a minority…[and] functions as a fundamental political policy to assure conformity and participation of the citizenry.
It’s getting a bit depressing.
7) Porter (1982)
Genocide is the deliberate destruction, in whole or in part, by a government or its agents, of a racial, sexual, religious, tribal or political minority. It can involve not only mass murder, but also starvation, forced deportation, and political, economic and biological subjugation. Genocide involves three major components: ideology, technology, and bureaucracy/organization.
Nothing to add here.
8) Bauer (1984)
[Genocide is] the planned destruction (… of a racial, national, or ethnic group as such, by the following means: (a) selective mass murder of elites or parts of the population; (b) elimination of national (racial, ethnic) culture and religious life with the intent of “denationalization”; (c) enslavement, with the same intent; (d) destruction of national (racial, ethnic) economic life, with the same intent; (e) biological decimation through the kidnapping of children, or the prevention of normal family life, with the same intent….
They don’t put us into death camps, but the ultimate effect is the same, looking at birth rates.
9) Barta (1987)
My conception of a genocidal society—as distinct from a genocidal state—is one in which the bureaucratic apparatus might officially be directed to protect innocent people but in which a whole race is nevertheless subject to remorseless pressures of destruction inherent in the very nature of the society.
10) Wallimann and Dobkowski (1987)
Genocide is the deliberate, organized destruction, in whole or in large part, of racial or ethnic groups by a government or its agents. It can involve not only mass murder, but also forced deportation (ethnic cleansing), systematic rape, and economic and biological subjugation.
Ethnic displacement is happening in Western cities. We just call it white flight. In the end, it means nothing but Whites being forced to move in order to live in a safe neighborhood.
11) Huttenbach (1988)
Genocide is any act that puts the very existence of a group in jeopardy.
I like this succinct definition. At that point I skipped ahead. I’ll add two more quotes below.
12) Gallagher (2013)
[Genocide is w]hen a collective source of power (usually a State) intentionally uses its power base to implement a process of destruction in order to destroy a group (as defined by the perpetrator), in whole or in substantial part, dependent upon relative group size.
13) Cox (2016)
Genocide is the attempt to destroy any recognized, stable, and permanent group as it is defined by the perpetrator: [It] is a concerted effort to eliminate its individual members and to destroy the group’s ability to maintain its social and cultural cohesion and, thus, its existence as a group. The perpetrators’ genocidal goals — i.e., intent, which is central to the 1948 UN definition but is often analyzed too legalistically and narrowly — can be uncovered by examining policies, actions, and outcomes.
Indeed, looking at the policies, actions, and outcomes, there is no doubt that Western elites have been executing white genocide. Just look at the welfare state: you bring in people who are unable to contribute to society, so they can’t do much more than smoke weed and reproduce. The welfare state encourages this behavior by copious handouts for both sitting on your ass and having children. As a consequence, the imported underclass is outbreeding the natives, which will eventually lead to Whites not only becoming a minority but disappearing altogether.
Also, look at the other side of the coin. A whitey could likewise be a bum and live off welfare, and plenty do. However, as a conscientious whitey you would not be content with just having children. Instead, you would want to support them to the best of your ability so that they can be happy and productive members of society. Child support would not change your budget in a significant way. Thus, this is an example of asymmetric motivation: As a member of the underclass, having four kids could mean doubling your income, in addition to getting a bigger place for free from the state. They don’t care very much about how well their kids will be doing in life, which is clearly obvious when you, for instance, consider that Germany has been breeding a Turkish underclass that gets less productive with every generation. We’re now at the fourth generation of that utterly useless but diverse bunch of welfare recipients.
But what is the net result of the kind of asymmetric motivation I just pointed out? Well, whiteys are disincentivized to have children, while the opposite effect is true for the dark-skinned replacement population. For more fun, look up how the mathematical operation called exponentiation works. If this is too theoretical for you and this article leaves you somewhat confused, here’s an easily digestible summary for productive whiteys: get out!